Howard County’s new Guaranteed Basic Income (GBI) pilot may be framed as compassionate policy, but it’s part of a troubling pattern that’s taking root across Maryland and the United States.
Following Baltimore City’s 2024 launch of the Baltimore Young Families Success Fund, a $5.5 million program offering $1,000 per month to 200 young parents for two years, Howard County is now embracing a similar model. These initiatives, while well-intentioned, risk steering the state toward a culture of unconditional support and economic complacency.
The Baltimore pilot targeted parents aged 18-24 earning up to 300% of the federal poverty level. While early reports tout improved emotional well-being and financial flexibility, harder questions remain unanswered: Did recipients pursue employment or education? Did dependency increase? And what happens when the payments stop? Those questions seemed to have conveniently escaped the minds of our elected leaders.
Now Howard County is replicating the model, offering $1,000 monthly to 20 families with no strings attached. These programs are not isolated. They’re part of a growing national movement, backed by coalitions like Mayors for a Guaranteed Income, that seeks to normalize unconditional cash transfers as a permanent fixture of public policy.
Hardworking, taxpaying Marylanders should be deeply concerned about this trend. Our state is inching toward a system where work is optional and public support is decoupled from personal responsibility. That could have devastating impacts on our economy. Maryland now risks becoming a testing ground for policies that undermine self-sufficiency.
Historical data from federal “negative income tax” experiments and recent studies from Illinois and Texas show that guaranteed income often leads to reduced labor participation and lower household earnings. When support is unconditional, the incentive to strive, train and contribute diminishes.
Other universal basic income programs have repeatedly failed to deliver the transformative results their advocates promise. In Canada, Ontario’s highly publicized basic income pilot was abruptly canceled after just one year due to ballooning costs and underwhelming outcomes. The program, which provided unconditional monthly payments to 4,000 individuals, showed little evidence of improving employment, education or long-term financial stability. Instead, it reinforced patterns of dependency without addressing the root causes of poverty.
Compassionate governance means empowering citizens, not subsidizing stagnation. If we truly want to uplift struggling families, we should invest in job training, child care and affordable housing, tools that build capacity, not complacency.
Maryland taxpayers already shoulder a heavy burden, and they have every right to expect that their contributions be invested in the core services that sustain daily life. From crumbling roads and underfunded transit systems to EMS units stretched thin and public schools in need of modernization, the state faces urgent infrastructure and service challenges.
Redirecting public funds toward unconditional cash payments, rather than strengthening these essential systems, sends the wrong message: that government is more interested in symbolic gestures than in delivering tangible improvements.
The trend is clear. Baltimore in 2024. Howard County in 2025. Which jurisdiction is next? Maryland should pay close attention to the findings from these universal income pilots and have a healthy dose of skepticism. If the state doesn’t exercise caution and takes the wrong lessons, it may find itself locked into a costly, ineffective model that lets politicians feel good at the expense of taxpayers.
Baltimore Sun editorial writers offer opinions and analysis on news and issues relevant to readers. They operate separately from the newsroom.